This blog has now moved. Please visit Zerochampion.com and update your bookmarks
Without proper post-occupancy evaluations we will be nowhere near to tackling the built environment's impact on the environment. A bit of a no-brainer but how much of it is actually taking place?
This blog has now moved. Please visit Zerochampion.com and update your bookmarks
This is a topic I'm going to be delving deeper into, both in this blog and in a more ambitious website I'm looking to create (more on that in future posts). So I decided to take a high profile building and find out how it was performing some years after completion, namely the MPs office opposite the Houses of Parliament, Portcullis House. I put a Freedom of Information request in a few weeks ago and received a pretty swift reply that pointed me to a recent parliamentary answer (see below). It shows a gradually reducing C02 usage, from 652 tonnes in 2003-2004 to 537 tonnes for the last year.
An article in Building Services Journal put the target energy use at 750 tonnes a year so there appears a marked improvement, namely a 28% drop in carbon dioxide usage in six years. I'm not quite sure how impressive such a performance is for a 23,000 square metre building (that's gross floor area). Any views on this?
Here's the question and answer in full:
Chris Huhne: To ask the hon. Member for North Devon, representing the House of Commons Commission, how often Portcullis House has been assessed for its (a) energy efficiency and (b) carbon emissions; what the trends in performance were; what plans the Commission has to assess Portcullis House in this way; and if he will make a statement. [134645]
Nick Harvey: Portcullis House is assessed on a regular basis both for energy efficiency and carbon emissions. There is a reducing trend for both as can be seen from the following table:
kWh |
kWh/m2 |
C tonnes | |
All electricity consumed on the parliamentary estate has come from renewable sources since 1 February 2007, therefore there will be no carbon emissions resulting from electricity consumption in future. This has contributed to the reduction in carbon emissions for the year 2006-07.
The Board of Management will consider again next month whether the House should seek to achieve ISO14001 and then eco-management and audit scheme accreditation (EMAS).
I've posted an entry on my blog on how the Portcullis House performance relates to other standards. It's pretty poor.
Trackbacks not working for some reason.
Posted by: Casey | 13 June 2007 at 08:28 PM